The Messenger-Cryptocurrency Game looks more like desperation than innovation
Reading Time: 2 minutes

“Bitcoin has established itself as the «digital gold», and Ethereum has proved to be an efficient platform for token crowd sales. However, there is no current standard cryptocurrency used for the
regular exchange of value in the daily lives of ordinary people. The blockchain ecosystem needs
a decentralized counterpart to everyday money — a truly mass-market cryptocurrency.”

Thus begins the white paper for Telegram’s own Open Network (TON), “designed to host a new generation of cryptocurrencies and decentralised applications.” It is, to put it politely, a lot of hot air. Bitcoin did not start off as digital gold, for one, but the bigger issue is still that “a truly mass-market cryptocurrency” requires a true mass-market, not buzzwords like disruption hurled at an imagined, credulous public. It reflects poorly on both Telegram and those tech journalists who have enabled these attempts to grab headlines.

Granted, it succeeds in identifying that fewer and fewer vendors in the real world are actually using cryptocurrencies (and for those in countries without such vendors, getting your money out of the system requires you to take all sorts of bizarre transactions). But it’s solution to the problem seems to be ‘you can use cryptocurrencies to purchase things in app!’ The idea that using what amounts to ‘in-game currency’ for services on Telegram will transform the cryptocurrency environment feels like the height of hubris – if Bitcoin and Etherium couldn’t break into the current banking scene (and not for lack of hype), then the idea that messenger-integrated TON will do so, merely by dint of being messenger-integrated, suggests a somewhat complicated relationship with ground truths.

There is also the question of the security, which Telegram casts as its main selling point. Ignoring the wonderful and salacious claims in the Fusion GPS memo, that the Russian government had compromised Telegram’s vaunted cryptography, we know for sure that hackers in Iran have done so. This does not bode well for the security of all that in-app currency in TON, or in bolstering that mass-market interest in cryptocurrencies more widely. Given the ease with which wallets can be lost, or the frequency with which exchanges turn out to be elaborate scams, it’s not hard to see why ordinary people aren’t so keen to turn hard-earned cash into ‘the next big thing’.

You could write off this decision by Telegram as a sort of fluke – a mistake by a company desperate to stand out from its rivals. This would be overly generous, since Kik (a messaging app most popular with kids and teens) is doing much the same. Yet again, the idea is that somehow, in-app currency will translate into a wider appeal for cryptocurrencies – or indeed, that a messenger app/cryptoexchange is all that’s needed to give blockchain-derived currencies a shot in the arm.

Cryptocurrencies are not beyond redemption, certainly – but the answers to their problems does not lie in the hubris of Telegram or Kik, attempting to build atop a system that is already unstable and then shouting that they are disruptors. If they want to make the blockchain really change the world, they’d try to set about lowering the power consumption which seems almost designed to take out nature in the process of making money; they’d try to work with vendors to see how trust in cryptocurrencies could be created. Instead, they’ve chosen to follow a path of over-blown estimates and wild claims. We’ve seen bubbles before, and they usually turn out poorly.

Read more

Oprah: The Candidate of Democrat Desperation

Reading Time: 4 minutesFor the first time in a while, there was a feel-good atmosphere in Hollywood on Sunday evening as Oprah Winfrey delivered a Golden Globes speech that many described as “presidential”. She sounded all the right notes about sexual harassment and rape, managing to present women–especially, black women–as righteous victims and brave fighters simultaneously. She pointed the finger of blame squarely at “brutally powerful men” […]

Read more

Does the Future of Religion Lie in Technology?

Reading Time: 6 minutesPeople’s lives are so saturated with it that they sometimes speak of “withdrawal symptoms” on those increasingly rare occasions when they find themselves without internet access. The question then is whether religion dies out and mankind continues without it, or whether one or many new religions are born into the vacuum that will be left {…]

Read more

What to Watch in 2018: The Biggest Tech Trends of the Year to Come

Reading Time: 3 minutes2017 has been a tumultuous year the world over – not least in technology. Between massive hacks of public and private organisations, the death of net neutrality in America, and the massive (and temporary) upsurge in the value of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, 2018 might have a tall bill to live up to. Here are the top five predictions for big tech trends over the coming twelve months [..]

Read more

Sesame Credit and the Future of Social Credit

Reading Time: 2 minutesWhen it comes to bashing countries for poor internet freedom practices, China usually appears near the top of the list – and with good reason. Perhaps in part that’s because, in contrast with more crude filtering systems adopted in many authoritarian states, the Great Firewall is an almost elegant panopticon […]

Read more

2017 Insights Analysis – GDPR

Reading Time: 3 minutesOur overall findings are that the discussion about GDPR is driven by fear of failing to become compliant, across all kinds of users. Just a glance at our groupings of top trending terms can give a flavour of keywords, which focus on guides and webinars which provide clear guidance on compliance. Discussions about more the more positive side of GDPR […]

Read more

Is there Hope Yet for the Rainbow Nation?

Reading Time: 9 minutesSouth Africa might be seen as a microcosm of the “globalised” world itself. Home to people of African, European, Indian, Asian, and mixed descent, it nevertheless attempts to find some unity of purpose in its diversity. To this end, in 1994 with the end of white minority rule, it styled itself as the “Rainbow Nation”: the idea that the country’s many racial and ethnic parts can make up a beautiful whole. But rainbows are also elusive, as anyone who has ever tried […]

Read more

Are Cryptocurrencies Truly the New Monetary Paradigm?

Reading Time: 2 minutesThe rule in journalism is that any question you can ask in a headline can invariably answered “No”. Sadly for cryto enthusiasts, that holds true in this case as well. In all fairness, the bubble has not burst yet, in spite of experts and media pundits all clamouring that it’s about to. The breathlessness with which mainstream outlets. which formally left electronic money to nice sites with coin in their name […]

Read more

Google versus Amazon: Whoever Wins, Consumers Lose

Reading Time: 3 minutesThe internet has always been defined by struggles between the titans. Just think of the Browser Wars – first fought between Internet Explorer and Netscape, and later Firefox, Chrome, and Explorer. They were sources of great innovation, certainly – looking back at a browser from even the mid 2000s is like dealing with alien technology […]

Read more

Hired Hands and Corporate Spies: The Pinkertons Ride Again

Reading Time: 3 minutesIt’s nearly two years since the protests against a then hypothetical Dakota Access Pipe Line (DAPL for short) began. They made good sense: oil pipelines have a somewhat dubious safety record, and DAPL seemed to go out of its way to heighten an already grim situation for North Dakota. According to The New York Times, the state has seen in the region of 18 million gallons of oils […]

Read more