Content

Not another collaboration.

Reading Time: 2 minutesDefining collaboration in today’s world. Feature update from Cronycle about how the product is adapting to these changes. “We all have the same amount of time in a day, and there is no way to get more of it. It doesn’t matter how successful or wealthy one is – we are all capped at 24 hours per day.” [..]

Read more

Content Clipper for Safari – launched today!
Reading Time: 1 minute

Content Clipper Safari Cronycle

Cronycle has a cool new feature for Apple users! You can now download the Content Clipper from the Safari extensions store.

The content clipper makes it easy to add articles you read from all over the web directly to boards, so you can make sure that article is part of your project, and discuss its relevance with your team.

You can also check to see if a website has a feed which you can add directly to your Cronycle, so you never miss out if they post a relevant article for you again.

For more information please see this post.

[button label=”Sign up for Cronycle Today” url=”javascript:void(0);” class=”initSignup”]

Read more

The Future of Reading
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Girl Reading

We were lucky enough to be mentioned on Future Foundations YouTube blog on ‘The Future of Reading’.

It has prompted us to think about what the future of reading will be.

Reading is simply a mechanism for processing information. @SeymourFuture believes that the future of reading will be driven by gadgets that enable us to read faster. But does ‘reading more’ necessarily mean you ‘acquire more knowledge’?

[quoter color=”aqua”]In order for reading to be valuable, you must be able to derive some actionable intelligence from the information [/quoter]

In order for reading to be valuable, you must be able to derive some actionable intelligence from the information – that is where information turns into knowledge and becomes incredibly powerful.

Why read more when you can read less, but make sure it’s always relevant content? That was one of the first questions the Cronycle founders raised when building the product. The idea developed to include collaboration, firstly because you can rely on your colleagues to notify you of articles which you should read, or are relevant for your business strategy and plan.

Secondarily, collaboration is important so your team can draw connections between different articles to find the groups opinion. You have to have the ability to add to the content by using comments to develop your ideas.

In business, it’s not the reading that matters, but what you can do with it. That’s why Cronycle is interested in ‘the future of knowledge‘ and not just the future of reading.

You can see Future Foundations video here:

https://youtu.be/FgRg-aO1z18

Sign up for Cronycle here

Read more

What’s all the fuss about content filtering?
Reading Time: 4 minutes

RSS Reader

A colleague of mine asked me this question a while ago when we were discussing the problem of the facebook algorithm. Here’s how it works: facebook shows you the news that it thinks you’re most likely to interact with. After all, if your second cousin posts endless pictures of things you’re not interested in, it makes sense for facebook to dial back on his updates and dial in some more interesting content from your sister, who posts news articles that keep you informed.

The problem is that, although this sounds fine in principle, in practise it creates a very different environment to the one you would expect. Often news is dialed back to make way for easy ‘clickbait’ type content, or videos are prioritised because they’re more engaging.

So, a computer decides what you get to see and what it will hide. And computers – while they can be incredibly smart – are not always going to make the same decisions as humans.

Over on GigaOm this week, Matthew Ingrams discussed the merits of Twitter vs facebook as a source for news. In the wake of the shocking incidents in Ferguson, Missouri, some people were surprised to see facebook almost completely devoid of news. Twitter was filled with live updates, eye-witness reports, photos and videos of events as they unfolded. Facebook: almost nothing. Why so different? While Facebook has a filtering algorithm constantly trying to guess what you’ll respond to, Twitter shows you everything from the people you follow, so you’re going to receive all the updates from people you follow in your timeline, whether you’re likely to retweet them or not. While Facebook is trying to be your personal shopper, hand-picking items it knows you’ll like, Twitter shows you all of the products in the shop.

The Twitter model is great, for a while, and gets around this initial problem of algorithmic filtering. Unfortunately, because you see everything, it can be incredibly difficult to keep track. We humans are, and always have been, fans of filtering and sorting. Even before the internet age, when we were bombarded with data from all sides, we’d rarely seek out everything – choosing instead to curate our sources (by buying a specific newspaper, or watching a particular news channel, for instance). To continue the shopping analogy, Twitter gives you the option of seeing every product, but there are so many on such a fast-moving conveyor belt you barely have time to examine something before twenty other things have gone whizzing past.

Can there be a balance? Well, there are a couple of possible ways to solve this problem. Method one – the one which facebook is trying is to simply make automated filtering better. Facebook tries to improve the algorithms so that they don’t get too one-sided, or churn out too much similar content – their priority is to keep you on the site and get you using it a lot, so ultimately if their algorithm is stopping you from doing that they’ll improve it. Twitter is also tweaking what shows up automatically on the timeline – recent changes to how ‘favourites’ are displayed have met with opposition from users, but it’s one of many experiments to try and make Twitter feel like a more  ‘usable’ place. To engage new users, Twitter is trying to introduce a form of content curation that makes it easier for people to find what they love.

Will either of these techniques work? Possibly. But one of the reasons we started Cronycle is that we think there’s a better option. Not better algorithmic filtering – because it will ultimately always run into the ‘machine’ problem – but applying a layer of human curation to the deluge of content.

Human curation is the solution to algorithmic content filtering

Cronycle takes all of your sources (the RSS feeds you subscribe to, the Twitter accounts you follow) and indexes all of the important content (anything that includes a link or image is pulled through). You can then filter and curate those posts into a collection based on criteria you choose – you can add a filter for the latest breaking news story, for example, filtering in only content from the news teams you really trust. You could have a different collection for updates on a particular area of industry, which gathers articles from expert sources that you’ve chosen yourself.

There’s a certain amount of machine help here, for sure – you’re not creating your own newspaper. Cronycle is useful because it helps you cut through the noise, and prevents you having to scroll through reams of irrelevant content just to get updates on the latest news story or blog post. But the key difference between Cronycle and any algorithmic filtering system is that you won’t run into the ‘facebook problem’ – machines pushing you content based on simplistic models of your behaviour. You choose the sources, you set the filters, and Cronycle indexes that content. Unlike facebook, it won’t ever second guess you.

Published on 21.08.2014 by Marina Cheale

[button label=”Start with Cronycle today!” url=”javascript:void(0);” class=”initSignup”]

Read more